So, in a nutshell, I think plastic surgery is fine if your desire to change your appearance comes from somewhere other than glossy magazines, porn films, and an arbitrary standard of beauty that I cannot find a reasonable source for, unless it’s the surgeons themselves. That (with some twists and turns) causes us to scamper back to the glossy magazines as a problem.
I held a subscription to Rolling Stone for the entire time I was in high school and college. I still remember receiving an issue (in April 2002, in fact) with Cameron Diaz, Christina Applegate and Selma Blair on the cover. That image made me suddenly self-conscious about something I’d never even considered: my knees. Their knees were so smooth, with a total lack of knobbles and wrinkles. In comparison, my knees practically had a cobblestone texture, lumpy, elephant-skin-like, utterly hideous. I had no idea about this horrible flaw until that moment, and I worried about it when wearing skirts for an embarrassingly long time before I came to my senses.
What I didn’t know in 2002 is that their knees were undoubtedly Photoshopped. That the sheen on their hairless shins, and the lack of visible veins on their high-heeled feet, and the total lack of a kneecap on Christina’s left leg, were all digital fakery. None of that bore any resemblance to my completely normal knees because they were simply not the way human skin and joints look.
There’s been a lot of ink spilled about Photoshopping (particularly in ABC News online, for some reason – check out good stuff here and here), but as far as I can tell, it’s mostly from the outrageous/shocked angle, such as that Ralph Lauren model who was p’shopped down to Holocaust size. What is this world coming to, they ask, when no one is portrayed in a magazine as himself or herself, when even French presidents have their love handles removed in paparazzi pictures?
A few months ago, I treated myself to an item on my Amazon wish list: Hurrell’s Hollywood Portraits, a coffee table book with pictures taken by George Hurrell, one of the most popular photographers in classical Hollywood cinema. I wanted this book because when I browsed the Look Inside! feature on Amazon, I saw a picture of Joan Crawford both before and after retouching. I was amazed. She had been cleaned up and polished so beautifully that the whole mood of the photograph was different. Her nasal-labial fold was erased, her barely-there dark circles were eliminated, her skin tone was wholly different, utterly normal neck wrinkles were gone, I think even her eyeballs had been touched up. The caption stated that the retoucher had spent six hours on the picture.
According to Norma Desmond, “we had faces then.” Well, I think what they had along with the faces was photographers - pictures taken by brilliant artists, photos that made women and men appear more glamorous, more smooth, more perfect than they ever could be in life. As time went on, reaching that ideal of Hollywood retouching became easier, with a few clicks in Photoshop replacing hours and hours of labor in the photo lab, but it continued to be necessary. I don’t think any pictures have been taken of humans more beautiful than the ones taken during the 1930′s-1950′s – look at this one of Garbo, for God’s sake - but that ideal of perfection has remained constant, in different forms.
It would be untrue for me to say that I don’t like this. One of my favorite things to do on the planet is look at pictures of movie stars. Their faces fascinate me. I probably own another half-dozen coffee table books like Hurrell’s Hollywood Portraits, and I take them out and I look at them repeatedly, and I love them. I have probably spent three hours poring over this picture alone, which has gathered what I think are easily 10 of the 20 most beautiful women in the world. I never imagine myself looking like the people in those pictures, exactly, but I do wonder why my skin has visible pores when theirs never does, and why they don’t seem to have underarm stubble, and how they have managed to hold at bay forehead wrinkles and spider veins and all the other things that I have on my body.
The answer is threefold: stylists, access to products and procedures I will never have, and Photoshop.
The practice of consistently Photoshopping everything in a magazine, to the point where it’s actually a story if an actress prefers not to be Photoshopped, can lead to a lot of young women feeling insecure about parts of their body that they need not. Like, say, their knees. But overall I cannot say it’s all bad. I’ve spent too much time enjoying the products of airbrushing and photo-doctoring, of feeling totally mesmerized by the carefully created images of women and men of glamor and fame. There’s only so much perfection that human people can achieve with their appearances, and that’s where Photoshop picks up, where humans leave off. If it’s possible to look at the doctored pictures not as an achievable ideal to make us feel as if we fail, but as fantasy images, pictures of an impossible ideal that we can enjoy without feeling insecure and inadequate, then it’s wonderful that such techniques as Photoshop exist.
I just worry that they do damage first, before people figure out how cardboard-fake the whole show is. I worry that people get plastic surgery before they discover what it is about themselves that they don’t like, and presume that with enough silicone and Botox, they’ll just be happy, no need to seek some deeper reason. I worry that young women look at flawless evening-gown bodies and don’t understand the hours in the gym, the hours before the mirror practicing for the camera, the hours with the stylist, and (likely) the excessive food deprivation that leads to such an appearance. They just feel bad that they don’t look like that.
There’s a big difference between wanting everyone to look similar, i.e. giving them all the same nose or the same size thighs or the same perfect tummy, and wanting every celeb on the cover of Cosmopolitan to look like her very most beautiful self. The reason this post is part 2, though, is that both plastic surgery and Photoshopping lead to assembly-line beauty: tanning booths, dyed and straightened hair, bikini waxes, hours on the treadmill. Ignoring our individual beauty in favor of the fashion of the era.
I still fall victim to it, despite being well aware of the parlor tricks. I still wonder why I don’t look like the Joan on the bottom instead of the Joan on the top. The answer is, paraphrasing Laurie, because not even the real Joan could look like the airbrushed Joan. That’s what airbrushing is all about.